<div dir="ltr"><span style="line-height:normal">2015-05-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg </span><span dir="ltr" style="line-height:normal"><<a href="mailto:sebastic@xs4all.nl" target="_blank">sebastic@xs4all.nl</a>></span><span style="line-height:normal">:</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote><span style="line-height:normal">On 05/27/2015 09:53 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote><span style="line-height:normal">>   Release to unstable</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote><span style="line-height:normal">Why did you decide to upload to unstable instead of experimental after all?</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote><span style="line-height:normal">I don't think an upload to unstable is a good idea at this point.</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote><span style="line-height:normal">Kind Regards,</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote><br>Bas<br></span></div></div></div></blockquote><br><span style="line-height:normal">Since we have a major soname bump, this new version </span><span style="line-height:normal">won't replace the old one</span><br><span style="line-height:normal">right away. </span><span style="line-height:normal">Packages depending on version 2.2 </span><span style="line-height:normal">will still work and won't be broken.</span><br><span style="line-height:normal">Only rebuilds against latest libmapnik-dev 3.0.0 will.</span><br><br><span style="line-height:normal">I figured that and went for unstable. Mind that version 3.0.0-rc3 is as close to final</span><br><span style="line-height:normal">version as it can get - there is actually nothing experimental in either upstream</span><br><span style="line-height:normal">version, nor debian packaging. The only experience is seeing how it will build on</span><br><span style="line-height:normal">other platforms.</span><br><br><span style="line-height:normal">If you prefer, you can also block migration to testing with a bug.</span><br><font color="#888888"><br></font><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class=""><font color="#888888">Jérémy</font></span></div></div></div></div>