Bug#266846: grub-splashimages: can you please include this fix? pretty please?

[Sean Finney]

hi luis, et al,

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:34:07PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> It's me from the team who is responsible for this and I've just been
> busy and have had no time to followup on it. I'll try to get it done
> soon.

okay.  in the meantime, i'm following through with my previous
commitment to do an NMU.  

following standard NMU procedures, i've just sent an upload into the
7-day DELAYED queue on gluck.  the only difference introduced
in this change is the addition of the line

/* XPM */

to the top of the gzipped copy of fiesta.xpm.  a point of advice for
future uploads of grub-splashimages:  there's no reason to have these
files gzipped in the source archive, as (a) it makes it impossible for
me to provide you with a sensible patch, and (b) the tarball containing
them is gzipped anyway.  you could always have debian/rules gzip them
in the binary debs too, so there would be not noticable difference
for people who installed the packages.  but this is a somewhat
superficial change, so i'll leave it to you to decide whether
or not it's worthwhile.


	sean
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grub-devel/attachments/20051015/9646b9a4/attachment.pgp