Bug#352731: An elementary solution of #352731?

[Robert Millan]

On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:41:01PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Mats Erik Andersson <ynglingatal at yahoo.se> writes:
> 
> >   This bug/deficiency has a trivial solution, in my
> > view at least. Is there some reason the attached patch
> > should not be applied to the upstream original? There
> > is indeed a minute risk that the timing inside the
> > shell between the actions
> 
> I personally liked this patch. Does any other maintainer disagree with
> me? Otherwise I can commit it.

Not that I object to it, but I think it should be committed upstream first,
and Mats seems to agree with me:

> Is there some reason the attached patch
> should not be applied to the upstream original? 

-- 
Robert Millan

My spam trap is honeypot at aybabtu.com.  Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters.  Writing to it will get you added to my black list.