Bug#570318: grub: -trunk kernel obsolete

[Ben Hutchings]

On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 16:44 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2010-09-04 03:16, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Yes, this is a serious issue - we are still seeing new bug reports on
> > the obsolete 2.6.32-trunk kernel packages, and this seems to be the
> > reason.
> 
> But knowing these issues, was it really neccessary to reintroduce
> packages with a "trunk" abiversion? (*-2.6.35-trunk-* in experimental?)
> Wouldn't something like "0trunk" trivially sort before (i.e. older than)
> "1"?

We never set a stable ABI number in uploads to experimental, so this
isn't a problem.  (The first 2.6.32-trunk upload was intended to go to
experimental too.)

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grub-devel/attachments/20100904/2a2c4fae/attachment.pgp>