[Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#647307: Bug#647307: Bug#647307: Bug#647307: haskell-xss-sanitize: fails to build on mipsel

Joachim Breitner nomeata at debian.org
Wed Nov 23 16:13:24 UTC 2011

Hi Gio, Dear mipsel porters,

Am Mittwoch, den 23.11.2011, 17:01 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
> On 22/11/2011 23:20, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
> >> I just asked to install build dependencies on eder to do tests on
> >> mipsel.
> > 
> > any news from this front?
> Yes: the package builds without errors. As usual, I don't know what to
> do in this situation. Moreover, today another build was attempted and it
> failed, but with a different error.
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=haskell-xss-sanitize&arch=mipsel&ver=
> Apparently rem and mayer have the same CPU, but mayer has more memory
> than rem. On the other side, eder (the porterbox I used for my
> compilation) has 1G RAM as mayer, and I'm not able to compare the CPUs
> (they appear to be quite different inside, even if theoretically they
> should behave the same).
> During the compilation on eder, I noticed that the cc1 process used
> about 80% of the memory, which leads me to thinking that it was also
> using heavily the swap.

the rebuild today was scheduled by me – after we identified memory to be
the culprit on armel, I thought it was worth a try. Maybe here the
problem is slightly a different one.

Dear mipesel porters, you know your boxes better: What could lead to a
successful build on eder, but failed builds on both mayer and rem?


Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-haskell-maintainers/attachments/20111123/1a63c71f/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list