[Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#682527: haskell-yesod-routes: FTBFS: Don't use "ghc-ghci" virtual-package-name on Build-Depends

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 02:47 +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> In Debian, it is usual to not "any" but listed the architecture to build.

Actually, no.  Unless the package builds but is then either
uninstallable or unusable on particular architectures, "any" is
precisely the right choice for architecture-dependent packages.

In this case, as a convenient example, it would mean that builds of the
package will automatically get tried on any new architecture for which
ghci is introduced (all other things being equal) without needing a
source upload.

Regards,

Adam