[Pkg-ime-devel] The upstream devlopment of SCIM packages

[Osamu Aoki]

On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:52:12PM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 07:46:40AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 11:25:41PM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 07:28:33PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 11:21:34PM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> > > > > The imengine plugin for scim-tables will be separated from scim and put
> > > > > into scim-tables package.  This means we can't have a arch:all package
> > > > > for scim-tables anymore.  Most likely I am going to add a arch:any
> > > > > scim-imengine-table package to the scim-tables source package.
> > > > 
> > > > You mean to keep arch:all part to be binary scim-tables package and add
> > > > binary scim-imengine-table package.  THat sounds good to me.
> > > 
> > > Yes that is what I meant, a binary package scim-tables-bin, for example.
> > 
> > Or scim-tables-common  (Some package use this too.  Emacs is the only
> > with one -bin-common .)
> 
> Hmm, I was under the impression that -common is a arch:all package along
> with other arch:any packages in the same source package, not vise versa.

You may be right here.

> However it doesn't seem to be the consensus.  Anyway on second thought,
> I am inclined with the name scim-imengine-table.  Let's leave this
> detail for later. :-)

Yes.  I changed KDE related issues since HEAD of KDE just got updated
last few days to fix issues.  1.3.5 is from November version.  So no
hope to get latest one for sarge.

Anyway, I will build and check and upload soon.

Osamu