[Pkg-ime-devel] brise: package renaming?

GUO Yixuan culu.gyx at gmail.com
Sun Jun 1 22:52:02 UTC 2014


On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:20:33AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Guo Yixuan <culu.gyx at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In version 0.30, several files were replaced with their updated version,
> > under different names.
> >
> > commit c17cd96 (tag: upstream/0.30, 1n1b/upstream)
> > Author: Guo Yixuan <culu.gyx at gmail.com>
> > Date:   Sun May 11 18:30:11 2014 -0400
> >
> >     Imported Upstream version 0.30
> >
> >  delete mode 100644 extra/stroke5.dict.yaml
> >  delete mode 100644 extra/stroke5.schema.yaml
> >  create mode 100644 preset/bopomofo_tw.schema.yaml
> >  create mode 100644 preset/stroke.dict.yaml
> >  create mode 100644 preset/stroke.schema.yaml
> >  create mode 100644 supplement/sampheng.schema.yaml
> >  delete mode 100644 supplement/stroke_simp.dict.yaml
> >  delete mode 100644 supplement/stroke_simp.schema.yaml
> >  delete mode 100644 supplement/triungkox3p.dict.yaml
> >  delete mode 100644 supplement/triungkox3p.schema.yaml
> >
> > I renamed the Debian packages accordingly [1][2]. Is this OK? If so, do we
> > need to declare conflicts + replace + provide in debian/control?
> >
> 
> I have no strong opinion on this, and if you are changing the package
> names, you need to handle the package transition.
> 
> Cheers,
> Aron

OK. In this case, the new packages don't have filename conflicts
with the old packages, so I'm going to add Provides, but without
Breaks/Conflicts/Replaces. I'll also add a NEWS.Debian to inform
the users of this change, so they can adjust their config files
accordingly.

Thanks,

Yixuan



More information about the Pkg-ime-devel mailing list