[Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#746968: ibus-array should be removed

[Osamu Aoki]

Hi,

On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 02:26:44AM +0800, Keng-Yu Lin wrote:
> As an Array 30 IM user, the ibus-table-array30 package did not
> implement the full features of the Array 30 IME (such as no quick
> codes, no first and second class simple codes) where ibus-array
> implemented these extra features.
> 
> Also as the package maintainer of ibus-array package, I am happy and
> will spend some time looking at the ibus-python issue.

Great.  Please check what did ibus-pinyin package did between 1.4.0 to
1.5.0 upstream versions to get the feel of migrating to Gobject
Introspection based bindings.  

These seems to be useful git repo for ibus-pinyin
  https://github.com/ibus/ibus-pinyin.git
  https://github.com/phuang/ibus-pinyin.git

Maybe this commit ...
https://github.com/phuang/ibus-pinyin/commit/4950900e3acc6cf0741962179e2b2b924964ae4f

which has changes such as;

  # along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
  # Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
 -import sys
 -import gtk
 -import ibus
 +
 +import gettext
  import locale
  import os
 -import version
 -import gettext
 +import sys
 +
 +from gi.repository import GLib
 +from gi.repository import Gtk
 +from gi.repository import IBus
  from xdg import BaseDirectory
  
 +import version


If upstream is stalled, you may think about taking over upstream.

Osamu

Osamu