libxalan2-java in main?

Mark Howard mh344@cam.ac.uk
Tue Oct 28 15:42:01 2003


--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> There is still  a problem with the javadoc. If we  can make javadoc with
> gjdoc, I think some packages can go to main. I think that ant developers
> want to facilitate the integration of gjdoc in ant so we can choose what
> tool to use to generate the documentation (as for the compier).

gjdoc should just work as a javadoc replacement, without need for
changes. There are a few missing features, but these are less important
than getting java into Debian IMHO.=20
The latest version of gjdoc has been working very well for me (e.g. see
libjava-gnome-doc package)
Is anybody working on getting ant to work in gjdoc? (a build.javadoc
property?)

I'm worried that gjdoc will get removed from the archive soon - it has
had an rc bug (depend on non-main libxalan2-java) for quite a long time.
It would also be *really* good if we could get these things in sarge.

--=20
  .''`. Mark Howard
 : :' :
 `. `'  http://www.tildemh.com=20
   `-   mh@debian.org | mh@tildemh.com | mh344@cam.ac.uk=20

--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/nn/3RIB09ZZvujwRAsx0AKC6urCmpSfb5KCCZmvwP6KPC4awfgCdFY6z
gxwMQjDr67HF5BM4qyqi4RY=
=fcwa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE--