Bug#249773: marked as done (what difference of tomcat4 between debian and apache.org?)

Fri Aug 13 05:40:02 2004

Your message dated Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:27:41 +0200
with message-id <411CA5AD.3090101@debian.org>
and subject line Bug#249773: what difference of tomcat4 between debian and apache.org?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2004 05:53:22 +0000
>From achaoge@sina.com Tue May 18 22:53:22 2004
Return-path: <achaoge@sina.com>
Received: from sina187-158.sina.com.cn (sina.com) [202.106.187.158] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BQK13-0004A1-00; Tue, 18 May 2004 22:53:21 -0700
Received: (qmail 14170 invoked from network); 19 May 2004 05:51:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sina.com) (218.88.75.159)
  by 202.106.187.158 with SMTP; 19 May 2004 05:51:35 -0000
Received: from(achaoge@sina.com) to(submit@bugs.debian.org)
Message-ID: <40AAF63C.80009@sina.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 13:53:00 +0800
From: gaochao <achaoge@sina.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5
X-Accept-Language: zh-cn
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: what difference of tomcat4 between debian and apache.org?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tomcat4
Version: 4.1.30-4
Severity: wishlist

mvnforum can't work but do well with tomcat4 from apache.org
What difference between them?

I download mvnforum from mvnforum.org, but it can't work with tomcat4 of
Debian's.
So I test tomcat-4.1.30 from apache.org, it works well.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-686
Locale: LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8

Versions of packages tomcat4 depends 
on:                                       
ii  adduser                    3.53          Add and remove users and 
groups   
ii  apache-utils               1.3.29.0.2-7  Utility programs for 
webservers   
ii  apache2-common             2.0.49-1      Next generation, scalable, 
extenda
ii  eclipse-javac [java-compil 2.1.3-1       Eclipse Java compiler and 
ant plug
ii  gcj-3.2 [java-compiler]    1:3.2.3-2     The GNU compiler for 
Java(TM)     
ii  gij-3.3 [java-virtual-mach 1:3.3.3-7     The GNU Java bytecode 
interpreter 
ii  j2sdk1.4 [java-compiler]   1.4.2.03-0.13 Java (TM) 2 SDK 1.4 (Sun)
ii  kaffe [java-compiler]      2:1.1.4-3     A JVM to run Java bytecode
ii  libtomcat4-java            4.1.30-4      Java Servlet engine -- core 
librar

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 249773-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Aug 2004 11:28:24 +0000
>From sgybas@debian.org Fri Aug 13 04:28:24 2004
Return-path: <sgybas@debian.org>
Received: from mail.edenmarket.de [62.96.68.2] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BvaES-0005Fg-00; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:28:24 -0700
Received: from [212.86.182.34] (helo=[133.107.2.69])
	by mail.edenmarket.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16)
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1BvaEg-0006dr-2Z
	for 249773-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:28:41 +0200
Message-ID: <411CA5AD.3090101@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:27:41 +0200
From: Stefan Gybas <sgybas@debian.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040626)
X-Accept-Language: de, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 249773-done@bugs.debian.org
References: <40AAF63C.80009@sina.com> <40CDA125.2080703@debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <40CDA125.2080703@debian.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 212.86.182.34
Subject: Re: Bug#249773: what difference of tomcat4 between debian and apache.org?
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enigC82FF0798445E9DCE3AA6EEB"
Delivered-To: 249773-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigC82FF0798445E9DCE3AA6EEB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I did not get answers to my questions for 2 months so I'm closing this 
bug report.

Stefan

--------------enigC82FF0798445E9DCE3AA6EEB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBHKWwCdoSgNrrJGsRAsy/AKDJG72dMMlLm7APcOeIs/453N18XACeMQJ4
/YQ2QI3gMHPSrjZTVYDlDrk=
=2K+u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigC82FF0798445E9DCE3AA6EEB--