Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:16:11 +0200
with message-id <87y8ln54pw.fsf@oz.fapse.ulg.ac.be>
and subject line dh_javadoc now remove the cache file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2004 15:03:38 +0000
>From ross@burtonini.com Mon Jun 28 08:03:38 2004
Return-path: <ross@burtonini.com>
Received: from smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BexfW-00027u-00; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:03:38 -0700
Received: from lionel.180sw.com ([82.44.126.41]) by smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600);
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:03:51 +0100
Received: from burtonini.com (unknown [192.168.0.2])
by lionel.180sw.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D4DC315AAA8; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:59:23 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ross by burtonini.com with local (masqmail 0.2.20) id
1BexfV-3Xb-00; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:03:37 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ross Burton <ross@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: dh_javadoc leaves files in package directory
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.62
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:03:37 +0100
Message-ID: <1BexfV-3Xb-00@burtonini.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2004 15:03:51.0703 (UTC) FILETIME=[1F806A70:01C45D21]
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gjdoc
Version: 0.6.1-9
Severity: normal
When I run dh_javadoc in my debian/rules, I have to manually remove
gjdoc_rawcomment.cache from the top-level directory. dh_javadoc should delete
this file for me, if gjdoc should be creating it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8
Versions of packages gjdoc depends on:
ii debhelper 4.2.11 helper programs for debian/rules
ii kaffe 2:1.1.4.PRE1.1.5-5 A JVM to run Java bytecode
ii kaffe-pthreads [kaffe 2:1.1.4.PRE1.1.5-5 A POSIX threads enabled version of
ii libgnujaxp-java 0.0.cvs20040416-6 free implementation of jaxp api
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 256694-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 09:16:47 +0000
>From arnaud.vandyck@ulg.ac.be Wed Jul 14 02:16:47 2004
Return-path: <arnaud.vandyck@ulg.ac.be>
Received: from serv09.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bkfsc-0005Xp-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 02:16:46 -0700
Received: (qmail 25501 invoked by uid 504); 14 Jul 2004 11:16:15 +0200
Received: from arnaud.vandyck@ulg.ac.be by serv09.segi.ulg.ac.be by uid 501 with qmail-scanner-1.16
(spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:.
Processed in 0.143362 secs); 14 Jul 2004 09:16:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO oz.fapse.ulg.ac.be) ([139.165.77.198])
(envelope-sender <arnaud.vandyck@ulg.ac.be>)
by serv09.segi.ulg.ac.be (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <256694-close@bugs.debian.org>; 14 Jul 2004 11:16:15 +0200
Received: from arnaud by oz.fapse.ulg.ac.be with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Bkfs6-0001AM-De; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:16:14 +0200
To: 256694-close@bugs.debian.org
Cc: 256694-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: dh_javadoc now remove the cache file
From: Arnaud Vandyck <avdyk@debian.org>
X-Face: yuSM.z0$PasG_!+)P;ugu5P+@#JEocHIpArGcQZ^hcGos8:DBJ-tfTQYWyf`$2r0vfaoo7F| h.;Agl'@x8v]?{#ZLQDqSB:L^6RXGfF_fD+G9$c:)p<yycF[Da]*=*
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:16:11 +0200
Message-ID: <87y8ln54pw.fsf@oz.fapse.ulg.ac.be>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Sender: Arnaud Vandyck <arnaud.vandyck@ulg.ac.be>
Delivered-To: 256694-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--=-=-=
Hi Ross,
the latest package should fix the problem. Can you please test
dh_javadoc and if there is still a problem, can you please re-open the
bug?
Many thanks,
--
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBA9Pne4vzFZu62tMIRAj02AJ0b/tt7UIuON9OQyRSL7tzF1cilCgCghQaI
xOn6wR0OtwfMp1FpiOXhff8=
=fVgp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--