Hi, http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fop.html Fop seems to be caught in a situation where it does not migrate to testing. Is it understood why? Looking at the excuses, it's not very clear, but it might be linked to the renaming of libfop-java into fop. Is a hint needed? Given than passivetex seems to have problems with big documents, it is quite important to get fop into testing. Cheers, Daniel