Bug#312014: marked as done (fop missing dependencies.)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner@bugs.debian.org
Sat Jun 4 22:09:02 2005
Your message dated Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:50:21 +0200
with message-id <20050604215021.GM12099@mails.so.argh.org>
and subject line Bug#312014: fop missing dependencies.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2005 20:57:56 +0000
>From uniball@gmx.net Sat Jun 04 13:57:56 2005
Return-path: <uniball@gmx.net>
Received: from foolab.org [67.18.92.211]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DefiO-0002bz-00; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:57:56 -0700
Received: from uniball.dyndns.org (unknown [62.135.86.48])
by foolab.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DDE7D832
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:57:53 +0300 (EEST)
Received: by uniball.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id F22484F3C4; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:57:05 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:57:04 +0300
From: Mohammed Sameer <uniball@gmx.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: fop missing dependencies.
Message-ID: <20050604205701.GA6811@uniball>
Reply-To: Mohammed Sameer <uniball@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Debbugs-Cc: uniball@gmx.net
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: fop
Severity: grave
apt-get install fop
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
fop: Depends: j2re1.3 but it is not installable or
j2re1.4 but it is not installable or
java2-runtime but it is not installable
Depends: libbatik-java (>=3D 1.5.1-1) but it is not going to be inst=
alled
E: Broken packages
I'm not sure whether it should depend on java-virtual-machine or not and if=
not I don't know how can this be solved!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.6-Uniball-1
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US (charmap=3DISO-8859-1)
--=20
----------------
-- Katoob Main Developer, Arabbix Maintainer.
GNU/Linux registered user #224950
Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Admin.
Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
--
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCohWdy2aOKaP9DfcRAhqrAKCCu0AuaE7OsJfgKA0bQI0Mup4uWQCgyIxB
pJ2gfnY3yaaJbpyjU7/gW8o=
=2Uim
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 312014-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2005 21:50:28 +0000
>From aba@not.so.argh.org Sat Jun 04 14:50:28 2005
Return-path: <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Received: from neualius.turmzimmer.net [217.160.169.58]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DegXE-0007z7-00; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:50:28 -0700
Received: from [195.60.122.97] (helo=metis.turmzimmer.net)
by neualius.turmzimmer.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DegXD-00063N-FH; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 23:50:27 +0200
Received: from eos.turmzimmer.net ([10.2.3.1])
by metis.turmzimmer.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DegX3-00081T-Ch; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 23:50:17 +0200
Received: from aba by eos.turmzimmer.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DegX7-0006U7-Kt; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 23:50:21 +0200
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:50:21 +0200
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
To: Mohammed Sameer <uniball@gmx.net>, 312014-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#312014: fop missing dependencies.
Message-ID: <20050604215021.GM12099@mails.so.argh.org>
References: <20050604205701.GA6811@uniball>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050604205701.GA6811@uniball>
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 312014-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
* Mohammed Sameer (uniball@gmx.net) [050604 23:08]:
> Package: fop
> Severity: grave
>
>
> apt-get install fop
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
>
> Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
> the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
> that package should be filed.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
Actually, fop is part of contrib. Packages in contrib and non-free are
allowed to depend on certain packages not part of Debian (whereas
packages in main are not). For this reason, this is not even a bug.
Cheers,
Andi