Bug#288009: batik 1.5.1 would break fop

[Steve Langasek]

--M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> I prepared a package for the batik 1.5.1 upstream release.
> However during testing the package I realized that batik 1.5.1
> breaks fop ! As far as I see no other packages depend on
> libbatik-java.

> fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
> A "solution" to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1
> and also to upload a new fop package with an embedded batik
> library in the current version (with the affected Squiggle
> class files removed from the library).

fop is not really a valid candidate, although it appears to be in
grep-excuses.  Both libfop-java and libfop-java-doc are uninstallable on
their own right in unstable, because libfop-java depends on fop and fop
conflicts with libfop-java.  You can safely ignore this package for the time
being...

--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCML7oKN6ufymYLloRAga3AKC0+AmRheebqgWFE8BRsXY1Y2wL/QCfRGrg
8WUR3h5nTc0i2dh72f+fTEQ=
=fmkZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS--