Bug#300780: Swatting a very visible bug - # 300780

Jeff Breidenbach jeff@jab.org, 300780@bugs.debian.org
Mon Mar 21 19:12:02 2005


Now that I think about it, lucene-demo-1.4.3.jar  has some very useful
programs. It's arguably in a better place now than before. How about
we leave it in the liblucene-java package, and follow the reporter's
suggestion?

"It seems like this should simply require the appropriate versioned
Conflicts/Replaces relationships to be declared."

This is just adding a dependency to make sure liblucene-java-doc <= 1.4.3-2 is
not installed at the same time as the current liblucene-java package. I think
that would solve the problem.

Cheers,
Jeff

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:51:33 -0500, Barry Hawkins <barry@yepthatsme.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Jeff,
> ~    From what I can tell so far, it looks like 300780 is related to my
> commenting out dh_movefiles.  That's what I get for trusting lintian
> blindly; bad, _bad_ new maintainer.  Working on a fix without
> reintroducing the lintian error; will ping you as soon as I have something.
> 
> Thanks,
> - --
> Barry Hawkins
> All Things Computed
> site: www.alltc.com
> weblog: www.yepthatsme.com
> 
> Registered Linux User #368650
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFCP2wU7bZ6kUftWZwRAgyhAKCh9X/mzxhXEUrAHapPbHwg/d1/2QCgwisL
> BENjCayeQuvR4W54TiILfq8=
> =leU9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>