Comments regarding bsh2_2.0b2-1_powerpc.changes

Wolfgang Baer WBaer@gmx.de
Tue May 17 07:11:03 2005


Hi all,

Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Sun, 15 May 2005 17:04:53 -0400, 
> Joerg Jaspert <ftpmaster@debian.org> wrote: 
> 
> 
>>Hi Maintainer,
> 
> 
> Hi Joerg, Hi all,
> 
> 
>>why is this packaged as a seperate bsh2 package?
>>Why not just as a new upstream version of bsh?
> 
> 
> We had a discussion about this but I can't find it in the
> archives... There was a compatibility problem. bsh1 (aka bsh) is the
> stable release and bsh2 is still beta but widely used and needed for
> another package.
> 
> Maybe Wolfgang rememeber our discussion.

Well, there are several api removals. However I am not sure if they
were used by external projects using bsh at all.

Currently, three packages require beanshell either as runtime or
build-depends: jmeter, jdee (debian name jde ??) and libjfreereport-java

According to upstream changelog for jdee they switched in a newer
upstream version to bsh2.0 so there should be no problem at all, if
the packages gets updated.

Current jfreereport-java comes with the old bsh in the download and
jmeter doesn't state anything on its pages or in the downloads.

 From a quick test:
libjfreereport-java and jmeter at least compile against beanshell 2.0.

> 
> Wolfgang, can we replace package bsh2 as bsh? Maybe upload it to
> experimental?

Well I think so - I will prepare a new upload.

@ftpmasters - please remove bsh2 from new queue
and sorry for the noise !

Wolfgang