Bug#334878: libbatik-java: Wrong libraries included (?)

Wolfgang Baer WBaer at gmx.de
Thu Oct 20 15:08:37 UTC 2005


Hi Philipp,

Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote:
> Package: libbatik-java
> Version: 1.6-1
> Severity: important
> 
> $ cat /usr/share/doc/libbatik-java/README.Debian
> ...
> batik.jar     (full library)
> batik-ext.jar (batik dom and sax bindings)
> batik-all.jar (batik without dom and sax bindings)
> ...
> 1. There is no batik.jar as mentioned in the README.Debian

Right the link got lost.

> 2. -all and -libs contains the same files

Thanks for noticing - must be a change in the build script.

I will prepare a -2 upload.

> 3. I'd like to also have Squiggle, the viewer application, please

As it is included (the classes) I assume you mean with script,
manpage ...

That is not on my TODO list in the near future as this would require a
reorganization of the batik package. Thats something to tackle if
upstream changes to the new xml-graphics-common and the packages
then needs to be reworked anyway.

Regards,
Wolfgang




More information about the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list