Adopting libapache-mod-jk and libapache2-mod-jk2

[Guus Sliepen]

On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 11:24:47AM +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote:

> > AFAIK there is no Supersedes: option for control files, but I wouldn't
> > Conflict, Provide or Replace libapache2-mod-jk2. There is no technical
> > reason why the packages couldn't coexist, and since the configuration
> > files have a different format you can't just replace jk2 with jk.
> 
> Sure they can coexist - however we want to remove libapache2-mod-jk2
> from the archive after mod-jk for apache 2 will be availabe. Therefore
> anything which would inform users to change to the new package would
> be good ...

How about after libapache2-mod-jk is accepted, you upload a new version
of libapache2-mod-jk2 that displays a debconf warning that it is
deprecated and that you should switch to libapache2-mod-jk in the near
future?

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
    Guus Sliepen <guus at sliepen.eu.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20050907/b0838b10/attachment.pgp