Bug#245204: marked as done (gjdoc does not allow for java alternatives?!)

Fri Sep 16 10:03:17 UTC 2005

Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:47:07 -0700
with message-id <E1EGCoF-0008CK-00 at spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#245204: fixed in gjdoc 0.7.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 21:36:26 +0000
>From gadek at debian.org Wed Apr 21 14:36:26 2004
Return-path: <gadek at debian.org>
Received: from anis.telecom.uqam.ca [132.208.250.6] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BGPOM-0003iq-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:36:26 -0700
Received: from anis4.telecom.uqam.ca (anis4.telecom.uqam.ca [132.208.250.236])
	by sortant.uqam.ca (8.12.10/8.12.1) with SMTP id i3LL5CFH020921;
	Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from antivirus.uqam.ca ([132.208.250.6])
 by anis4.telecom.uqam.ca (SAVSMTP 3.1.1.32) with SMTP id M2004042117065915197
 ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:06:59 -0400
Received: from [132.208.135.92] (oops.info.uqam.ca [132.208.135.92])
	by intrant.uqam.ca (8.12.10/8.12.2/uqam-filtres) with ESMTP id i3LL0pXb004537;
	Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:00:53 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Filter: Filtre-Uqam re:  abuse at uqam.ca
Subject: Re: gjdoc does not allow for java alternatives?!
From: "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <gadek at debian.org>
To: submit at bugs.debian.org
Cc: Arnaud Vandyck <avdyk at debian.org>, etienne.gagnon at uqam.ca
In-Reply-To: <87brllzpnj.fsf at oz.fapse.ulg.ac.be>
References: <20040421044016.GA4535 at gadek.homelinux.org>
	 <87brllzpnj.fsf at oz.fapse.ulg.ac.be>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1082581290.15629.44.camel at oops>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:01:31 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: gjdoc
Severity: serious
Justification: major negative effect on usability of a package

Summary: Current gjdoc is broken in a way that it explicitely requires
kaffe to run. It does not work even with Sun's jdk. 

This bugreport has been sent here so that it was not forgotten and to
give the maintainer honors of closing it when the time comes :)

					Grzegorz B. Prokopski

On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 04:44, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <gadek at debian.org> writes:
> 
> > Hi Arnaud,
> >
> > I've looked at http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gjdoc.html and got
> > thrilled by: Depends: gjdoc kaffe (not considered) Even though I could
> > not install new gjdoc (you should have received my separate email about
> > it) I decided to look into the sources:
> >
> > Depends: debhelper (>>4), kaffe (>= 1.1.4), libgnujaxp-java (>=
> > 0.0.cvs20040416)
> >
> > What!? Where did the | java1-runtime alternative go?
> 
> Yes, strange, but gjdoc does not work with gij neither with sablevm :'(
> 
> > Now seriously: I understand that you work a lot with kaffe and I
> > believe that you have tested this new gjdoc packages w/ kaffe to make
> > sure it works, but I strongly disagree with such setup of dependencies
> > because:
> >
> > 1. It does not allow a user to use any alternative JVM. What does
> > kaffe have that a JVM providing java1-runtime would not have? Not to
> > mention that you should also allow for java2-runtime alternative. In
> > this way it unnecessarily takes away users' freedom!
> 
> Man! gjdoc does not work with my IBMJ2sdk-1.1.4!
> 
> > 2. As for other packages that have been moved to main and have
> > explicit dependency on Kaffe - it is dangerous, because if kaffe does
> > not make it to testing before we start freezing Sarge, all these
> > packages will never make it! And I really want to have GJDOC in Sarge!
> 
> I know that and I tried to correct this after your first mail. Maybe
> sometimes I forget...
> 
> > I may file a bug with the above content, but I feel that sometimes it's
> > better to send things privately.
> 
> No problem, I know you and I make mistakes (well, often and a lot!
> ;-)). Please, file bugs, my Mozilla start page are planet classpath,
> planet debian, savannah and my Debian QA page ;-) So I look at my bugs
> everyday, it's a really good reminder.
> 
> > In particular, I admire the work that you've done to make it possible
> > for many packages to migrate to main.  But it looks like the
> > monocultural approach (that is, using Kaffe everywhere) has similar
> > negative effects we know from other places where we see monoculture.
> 
> Yes, I know that it's really bad, but hey, kaffe packager does a really
> good job, look at the current kaffe package, changelog.Debian! What a
> huge work! Well, look closer and search about the bug Ean claim to close
> (make the search in the changelog.debian itself!)... already closed! And
> when?... Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:09:40 -0600
> 
> haha!
> 
> So do not hesitate to file bugs, I'll re-upload the packages asap, but
> for gjdoc, there are some problems!
> 
> > You can not have Free Software when you take away choice.
> 
> Yep! I totally agree with you and I should send the bug reports before,
> sorry.
> 
> Many thanks for your pointers and once again, I don't take bug reports
> as an attack but as an advice and as a reminder.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> - -- 
>   .''`. 
>  : :' :rnaud
>  `. `'  
>    `-    
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFAhjRj4vzFZu62tMIRAsQUAKCsnT0tlI+NGyRI35kGcMTGWc4efQCgv1fG
> Bwc50BzoLuAOos4pmTXwC/8=
> =FmbB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 245204-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2005 09:48:33 +0000
>From katie at spohr.debian.org Fri Sep 16 02:48:33 2005
Return-path: <katie at spohr.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EGCoF-0008CK-00; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:47:07 -0700
From: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx.de>
To: 245204-close at bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#245204: fixed in gjdoc 0.7.5-2
Message-Id: <E1EGCoF-0008CK-00 at spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie at spohr.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:47:07 -0700
Delivered-To: 245204-close at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: gjdoc
Source-Version: 0.7.5-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gjdoc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gjdoc_0.7.5-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gjdoc/gjdoc_0.7.5-2.diff.gz
gjdoc_0.7.5-2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gjdoc/gjdoc_0.7.5-2.dsc
gjdoc_0.7.5-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gjdoc/gjdoc_0.7.5-2_i386.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 245204 at bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx.de> (supplier of updated gjdoc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster at debian.org)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:12:57 +0000
Source: gjdoc
Binary: gjdoc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx.de>
Description: 
 gjdoc      - documentation generation framework for java source files
Closes: 245204 319168
Changes: 
 gjdoc (0.7.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Depends on java-gcj-compat | java1-runtime (Closes: #245204, #319168)
   * Moved Build-Depends-Indep to Build-Depends
   * Build-Depends on java-gcj-compat-dev instead of kaffe, jikes, fastjar
   * debian/rules: Use commands from java-gcj-compat-dev
   * debian/rules: Dont delete files installed to /usr/lib
   * debian/control: Make gjdoc an architecture dependant package
   * Fixed address of FSF in debian/copyright
   * Updated Standards-Version to 3.6.2
Files: 
 112a77cfd93d627a160fe4bb01b831b4 841 devel optional gjdoc_0.7.5-2.dsc
 babe45f98b757909902f340b39aa6927 45740 devel optional gjdoc_0.7.5-2.diff.gz
 c50b2d0190d44b20be868848b86aef7a 1364500 devel optional gjdoc_0.7.5-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDKpLu+FmQsCSK63MRAlUyAJ4yVSJPBEub24g9SWFiF+Q1lPO9egCeOsBH
4Splk9IXHjMeG6p3qQDjSrU=
=tmOF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----