Bug#460152: bouncycastle_1.38-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS, use gcj-4.2 on m68k?

Stephen R Marenka stephen at marenka.net
Fri Jan 11 13:26:09 UTC 2008


On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:01:45AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 05:08:15PM -0600, stephen at marenka.net wrote:
> > Package: bouncycastle
> > Version: 1.38-1
> > Severity: important
> > 
> > 
> > bouncycastle fails to build from source on m68k. The default on m68k is
> > now gcj-4.2, maybe it's time to change the build-deps?
> 
> bouncycastle does not depend on gcj-4.2 directly. So no Build-Depends to
> change.
> 
> > It's also possible some other package isn't up-to-date because we're 
> > working through a backlog, but changing to gcj-4.2 is probably a good 
> > idea anyway.
> 
> java-gcj-compat-dev needs to be updated to Depend on gcj-4.2 instead of
> gcj-4.1 on m68k.

Sorry about that, I was indeed looking at java-gcj-compat-dev while I
was following this up.

> > A full buildd log is available at 
> > <http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=bouncycastle&ver=1.38-1&arch=m68k>
> 
> Something is borked. This bug is a duplicate of #440669 which was fixed
> in bouncycastle 1.37-2. Its suspicious that it returns on *only* m68k.

Don't worry about it, we'll see what happens when get
java-gcj-compat-dev fixed.

Thanks,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen at marenka.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20080111/78858d0c/attachment.pgp 


More information about the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list