jetty6 vs jetty as a package name

Torsten Werner twerner at debian.org
Wed Jul 22 21:09:40 UTC 2009


On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Thierry
Carrez<thierry.carrez at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> It also uses a different default port, by the way. My point is that the
> packaging is different, the upstream product is a major rewrite version,
> so it's clearly not the same thing.

Renaming the package to jetty6 makes it more flexible (even if we
might not need the flexibility currently). That is why I am in the
jetty6 camp now. Should I ask the ftp-masters to reject the current
jetty upload? I am willing to upload a jetty6 package.

Cheers,
Torsten



More information about the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list