jetty6 vs jetty as a package name

Thierry Carrez thierry.carrez at
Sun Jul 26 12:31:19 UTC 2009

Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:33:45PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
>> The discussion is probably over because jetty 6.1.19-1 has been
>> accepted into experimental. But we can still call the next major
>> version jetty7.
> As long as jetty 6.x is not in unstable nothing is decided. Its still
> possible to do jetty 5.x uploads to unstable and upload jetty6 6.x to
> unstable too.

OK, let me know what your final decision is on how it will be named once
it reaches unstable. It will affect the name of the package I'll soon
upload to Ubuntu to provide Jetty6 libraries to Eucalyptus. It will
still make a much simpler sync in the future if it were called jetty6,
but it's still your decision :)

Thierry Carrez
Ubuntu server team

More information about the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list