Bug#558184: missing OSGi metadata

Niels Thykier niels at thykier.net
Mon Nov 30 22:20:17 UTC 2009


Hi

I am not sure how to handle the OSGi for lucene2. The obvious answer
would be to append it to the manifest files after they have been
generated; however I have checked lucene from Fedora and they discard
the generated Manifests in favor of their own handmade ones. This is
looks like a much easier approach on the packaging side.

However, this means that they do not include the "Specification-*" and
the "Implementation-*" fields in their manifest. So the question is;
would we be okay with(out) that?

I have attached the direct links to the handmade manifest files as well
as the link to the lucene package in Fedora's repository for reference.

~Niels

lucene-core.jar manifest:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/lucene/devel/lucene-1.9-OSGi-MANIFEST.MF?revision=1.3&view=markup

lucene-analyzers.jar manifest:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/lucene/devel/lucene-1.9-analysis-OSGi-MANIFEST.MF?revision=1.3&view=markup

Package repository:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/lucene/devel/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20091130/7f7199d4/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list