Bug#588943: hard interdependency

Guillaume Mazoyer respawneral at gmail.com
Sat Sep 18 10:56:41 UTC 2010


> The interdependency between libjava-gnome-java and libjava-gnome-jni is
> hard; so a >= in the versions isn't a good idea [from upstream's
> perspective]
Yes, that is right. In my first patch I used "= 4.0.16".
Then, I should use "= ${source:Version}" instead of ">=
${source:Version}".

-- 
Guillaume Mazoyer - http://www.respawner.fr/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: java-gnome_4.0.16-1_debian.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3446 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20100918/d2e108dc/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20100918/d2e108dc/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list