pirl_2.3.4.dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Luca Falavigna dktrkranz at debian.org
Wed Apr 18 16:23:21 UTC 2012


Il 18 aprile 2012 09:00, Mathieu Malaterre
<mathieu.malaterre at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> The explanation in the d/README.source was not clear ? Upstream did
> messed up the licensing. PIRL was /supposed/ to be GPL-2.

It's advisable to put this kind of information directly in the
copyright file, as it's the preferred source to seek for copyright
stuff, and the file FTP Team looks into.

> Anyway after talking with upstream they went throught the whole
> codebase and relicensed everything under a clear LGPL-3, which has
> been uploaded as version 2.3.6.

Nice, I'll do another review ASAP.

Cheers,
Luca



More information about the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list