Backport of ant?

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Montag, den 13.02.2012, 18:47 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Joachim Breitner <nomeata at debian.org> wrote:
> > Dear Maintainers of fop, ant, maven-repo-helper,
> > libxml-commons-resolver1.1-java and xmlgraphics-commons,
> >
> > I’d like to backport fop to sequeeze, and I successfully built it on
> > sequeeze after also backporting the packages mentioned above. No source
> > changes were required besides these two changes to the metadata (all of
> > which could safely go into the packages in unstable):
> 
> Shouldn't RC bug be fixed first ? I am thinking of #657281.

thanks for checking that, I did not look at open bugs. In this
particular case (non-free but distributable file lying around in the
source unmodfified) I think it is reasonable to upload the package as it
is to backports, nothing gets worse this way. I’ll try to remember to
update the package when a fixed packages enters testing.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20120213/fddde3ca/attachment.pgp>