Bug#660757: marked as done (tomcat7-common depends on java6, but what about java7?)

Mon Feb 27 07:21:13 UTC 2012

Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:17:55 +0000
with message-id <E1S1uqJ-0003oh-6v at franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#660757: fixed in tomcat7 7.0.23-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #660757,
regarding tomcat7-common depends on java6, but what about java7?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
660757: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660757
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Rohde Fischer <rohdef at rohdef.dk>
Subject: tomcat7-common depends on java6, but what about java7?
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:29:19 +0100
Size: 1907
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20120227/2064bbc2/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: tony mancill <tmancill at debian.org>
Subject: Bug#660757: fixed in tomcat7 7.0.23-2
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:17:55 +0000
Size: 9081
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20120227/2064bbc2/attachment-0001.mht>