Bug#736106: Sourceless file

Felix Natter fnatter at gmx.net
Wed Jan 22 20:46:31 UTC 2014


Eric Lavarde <Eric at Lavar.de> writes:

> Hi,

hello Eric,

> Why not 3. Create a separate package with a recommend/suggest relation
> between both?

That's a good idea. Can I just let the new package
("freeplane-flash-browser") put the file in
"/usr/share/freeplane-flash-browser/visorFreeplane.swf",
and then create a symlink from
/usr/share/freeplane/resources/flash/visorFreeplane.swf to 
/usr/share/freeplane-flash-browser/visorFreeplane.swf
in the freeplane package?
(it must be in /usr/share/freeplane/resources/... or in freeplaneeditor.jar)

--> @QA: is it ok to fix this with the upcoming 1.3.x release and leave
1.2.23-2 as is?

Thanks and Best Regards,
Felix

> Eric
>
> Felix Natter <fnatter at gmx.net> wrote:
>
>     Felix Natter <fnatter at gmx.net> writes:
>     
>          hello Bastien,
>         
>          thanks for pointing this out.
>         
>          Can we keep the package (in main) until I fix this in Freeplane 1.3.x
>          (will be released in a few months [1]), or do I need to fix it _right
>          now_?
>         
>          [1] Then I would fix it cleanly and disable the Flash export upstream.
>     
>     I've talked to upstream and it turns out the source code is in another
>     git repository:
>       https://github.com/freeplane/misc/tree/master/flash-browser
>     
>     I see two solutions:
>     
>     1. tell upstream to include the source (~300k) in all source packages
>     
>     2. ZIP those files and include them as a Debian patch.
>     
>     (2) could easily be done for 1.2.23.
>     Thanks and Best Regards,
>
> --
> Sent from my tablet. Please excuse my brevity.
>

-- 
Felix Natter



More information about the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list