RFS: jacoco/0.7.7-1 [ITP]

殷啟聰 seamlikok at gmail.com
Thu Jul 28 10:05:43 UTC 2016


Hi Markus,

I added more sections to d/copyright.

About those additional POMs, I have no idea why they still are
installed, since I have already marked them "--ignore-pom". I tried
adding "--no-parent" but still didn't work. Eventually I get them
deleted using d/rules.

I pushed all the changes. Thank you for the review!

Cheers,
Kai-Chung Yan

2016-07-28 4:14 GMT+08:00 Markus Koschany <apo at debian.org>:
> Hi Kai-Chung,
>
> the package is almost ready to upload but the copyright file needs some
> updates:
>
> These files are licensed under Apache-2.0
>
> Apache-2.0:
>
> org.jacoco.doc/xsl/junit-noframes.xsl
> org.jacoco.report/src/org/jacoco/report/internal/html/resources/prettify.js
>
>
> W3C software license:
>
> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720
>
> org.jacoco.report.test/src/org/jacoco/report/internal/html/xhtml1-strict.dtd
>
> A verbatim copy of the EPL-1.0 is required for the rest. A link is
> unfortunately not enough. You can just copy&paste the license from my
> robocode package.
>
> I have removed the duplicate occurrence of "javahelper" in debian/rules
> and I did some minor cosmetic changes in d/control.
>
> I wonder a little where those maven pom files are coming from:
>
> /usr/share/maven-repo/org/jacoco/root/0.7.7.201606060606/root-0.7.7.201606060606.pom
>
> /usr/share/maven-repo/org/jacoco/org.jacoco.build/debian/org.jacoco.build-debian.pom
>
> Since we only need the org.jacoco.core artifact at the moment, they are
> probably superfluous. What do you think?
>
> Regards,
>
> Markus
>



-- 
/*
* 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
* 一生只向真理與妻子低頭
* Undergraduate student in National Taichung University of Education
* LinkedIn: <https://linkedin.com/in/seamlik>
* Blog: <http://seamlik.logdown.com>
*/



More information about the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list