dapal at debian.org
Sat Nov 19 18:42:49 UTC 2011
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:20:00 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 19/11/2011 18:51, David Paleino wrote:
> > [..]
> > I can't think of any other way of keeping things sane, other than patching
> > all apps to work with the packaged modules (in this case I'll stop right
> > away working on TileMill, it's too far away from my possibilities), or
> > bundling the needed modules in the orig tarball.
> > What's your opinion on this?
> Please do NOT follow that path !
I'm also against that. But it's been long since I wanted tilemill in Debian :D
> I'll help you with patching TileMill to it runs well with bones 2.0
> It looks very easy to do :
I'm not sure that's really easy: I've been in contact with
developmentseed/mapbox guys (mapbox seems to be a subset of developmentseed),
who both develop tilemill *and* bones, and they told me that would've been a
huge task, and I would only get headaches :)
That's why I didn't try further in porting tilemill to bones 2.
I'll try following the lines written in that changelog, let's see if everything
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available