jerry at edagames.com
Sat Oct 15 15:15:36 UTC 2011
On 15/10/2011 15:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-10-15 at 11:20am, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> On 15/10/2011 08:21, David Paleino wrote:
>>> I started a first draft, based on the recent emails, of a 'Debian
>>> so any help is much appreciated.
>> Thank you a lot for this.
> Yes, great initiative!
> Since we have now grown to not only do packaging but also formulating
> Policy, I took the liberty to rename our team page to be more wiki-like
> (not simply mirroring what was limited by Alioth naming convention):
> ...and here is therefore (unsurprisingly) new location of Policy:
>> We still have to choose if using /usr/share/nodejs as a place to put
>> native (i mean pure js) node modules is a good idea. It certainly is
>> not a bad one, but won't it disturb node users ? They are used to find
>> node modules in something like /usr/lib/node.
> Could you elaborate on the situations that the system path is used
> directly - as opposed to letting Node resolve it?
> I mean - would any *code* break from using an unusual path in Debian (as
> is the case e.g. for the issue of renaming the node binary to nodejs),
> or does it only affect habbits among Node developers manually looking up
> what is available to them on this machine, while coding?
Yes, you're right.