[Pkg-javascript-devel] Javascript Policy

[Marcelo Jorge Vieira]

On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:53 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-03-15 at 09:57pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > here are my preferences about two small questions that could be fixed 
> > by http://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Policy
> > 
> > * nothing is said about the preferred source package name when
> >   "library is usable both from a web-browser and from NodeJS"
> >   I would naively say "let's keep upstream name", what do you say ?
> 
> I see no reason for us to mandate a certain source package name, and 
> therefore recommend we keep it as-is: We have no Policy on source 
> package name.
> 
> 
> > * Capitalizations :
> >   JavaScript or Javascript
> >   NodeJS or Nodejs ?
> >   I prefer when only the first letter is in caps.
> 
> I prefer the correct name.  So let's check which is more correct...
> 
> http://nodejs.org/ says Node.js
> 
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript says JavaScript


+1


Cheers,

-- 
Marcelo Jorge Vieira
xmpp:metal at jabber-br.org
http://metaldot.alucinados.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20120315/0546d408/attachment.pgp>