[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding impress.js_0.5.3-1_amd64.changes

[Cédric Boutillier]

Hi Ansgar,

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:03:48PM +0000, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,

> why does d/copyright say "Expat or GPL-2+"? The upstream sources contain a
> notice saying "Released under the MIT and GPL Licenses." (i.e. any version of
> the GPL).

> Note that "MIT License" might refer to one of several licenses.

> It would probably be best if upstream included the full text of the licenses to
> avoid any uncertainties.

As indicated in the Comment field of the debian/copyright file,
referring to the following url:
https://github.com/bartaz/impress.js/issues/225
I asked upstream some clarification about the license. The answer has
been what is mentionned in the copyright file: GPL-2+ or Expat.

Unfortunately, this does not appear yet clearly in the code. I'll insist
that they include clearly the license in the code.

Cheers,

Cédric

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20130227/3a06b152/attachment.pgp>