Fwd: Re: Backport of jed 0.99.18
joerg at alea.gnuu.de
Mon Aug 21 21:06:55 UTC 2006
I've got this question on the backports mailing list and I don't know
really what I should answer. Can someone help me?
From: backports at nixda.org (Martin Reising)
Subject: Re: Backport of jed 0.99.18
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:02:36 +0200
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 12:24:51PM +0000, Joerg Sommer wrote:
> And jedstate is replaced by gdbmrecent.
No package named or contains gdbmrecent is found by packages.debian.org.
> I must ask, why jed-extra did not lower the dependency as I requested
I can not remember why I installed findutils 4.2.20-1 from
snapshot.debian.net, but one reason was this part of debian/rules
# install mode documentation
dh_install $$(find . -wholename ./debian -prune -o \( -name \*.html \
-o -name \*.otl -name \*.example -o -name README \) -print) \
> and what should happen with jedstate.
jedstate works if 99jedstate_hook.sl is moved from /etc/jed-init.d to
Nicht Absicht unterstellen, wenn auch Dummheit ausreicht!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-jed-devel/attachments/20060821/7150271c/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-jed-devel