Release Jed 0.99.18-1

G. Milde g.milde at web.de
Tue May 16 11:43:54 UTC 2006


On 16.05.06, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at debian.org> [2006-05-16 09:29]:
> 
> > * G. Milde <g.milde at web.de> [2006-05-16 09:16]:
> > 
> > > I would go for the simplest (which is IMO the second variant) and commit
> > > the change if there is no complaint.
> > 
> > Do you mean the one with the --ignore-fail-on-non-empty option?  This is my
> > preference too.
> 
> Okay, I went ahead and uploaded 0.99.18-1 to experimental using the option
> above to the rmdir command.

Fine! I just saw the new experimental package is out and I will give it a try.


> My checklist for moving the package to unstable is:
> 
>    * Write a debian/NEWS file

       I am just working on it. Also, updating README.debian and making
       it to a file usefull for end-users. 
       
       BTW: What is the difference of README.debian vs.
            jed-common.README.Debian?
              
>    * Coordinated upload of jed-extra to unstable
>    * Make sure that jed-extra upgrades smoothly from 0.1.8 (the version in
>      stable, testing and unstable).

>    * Cope with the jedstate package, which will be become useless with the
>      new jed pacakge

       Could we just replace|conflict?
        
> Until all these issues are addressed, I think we should keep uploading
> to experimental.

Agreed.

Günter

-- 
Milde ife.et.tu-dresden.de



More information about the Pkg-jed-devel mailing list