Release Jed 0.99.18-1
G. Milde
g.milde at web.de
Tue May 16 11:43:54 UTC 2006
On 16.05.06, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at debian.org> [2006-05-16 09:29]:
>
> > * G. Milde <g.milde at web.de> [2006-05-16 09:16]:
> >
> > > I would go for the simplest (which is IMO the second variant) and commit
> > > the change if there is no complaint.
> >
> > Do you mean the one with the --ignore-fail-on-non-empty option? This is my
> > preference too.
>
> Okay, I went ahead and uploaded 0.99.18-1 to experimental using the option
> above to the rmdir command.
Fine! I just saw the new experimental package is out and I will give it a try.
> My checklist for moving the package to unstable is:
>
> * Write a debian/NEWS file
I am just working on it. Also, updating README.debian and making
it to a file usefull for end-users.
BTW: What is the difference of README.debian vs.
jed-common.README.Debian?
> * Coordinated upload of jed-extra to unstable
> * Make sure that jed-extra upgrades smoothly from 0.1.8 (the version in
> stable, testing and unstable).
> * Cope with the jedstate package, which will be become useless with the
> new jed pacakge
Could we just replace|conflict?
> Until all these issues are addressed, I think we should keep uploading
> to experimental.
Agreed.
Günter
--
Milde ife.et.tu-dresden.de
More information about the Pkg-jed-devel
mailing list