[Pkg-julia-devel] building julia 0.3

Ross Boylan rossboylan at stanfordalumni.org
Wed Jul 23 04:31:37 UTC 2014


I redid the make (with the SUITESPARSE removed), but I'm not entirely
sure what happened.  First, I don't see a reference to a sparse
submodule, though something was downloaded.  Second, some libraries
were built, but not the julia executable.  Will it just pick the right
ones up dynamically?

/usr/local/src/julia/julia /usr/local/src/julia
Submodule 'deps/Rmath' () registered for path 'deps/Rmath'
Submodule 'deps/libuv' () registered for path 'deps/libuv'
Submodule 'deps/openlibm' () registered for path 'deps/openlibm'
Submodule 'deps/openspecfun' () registered for path 'deps/openspecfun'
Submodule 'doc/juliadoc' () registered for path 'doc/juliadoc'
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100 21.4M  100 21.4M    0     0   261k      0  0:01:24  0:01:24 --:--:--  227k
ar: creating libcerbla.a
a - xerbla.o
ar: creating libsuitesparseconfig.a
a - SuiteSparse_config.o
ar: creating libamd.a
a - amd_global.o
[much more]
ar: creating librbio.a
a - RBio.o

cholmod_version does appear on the transcript, and there are no errors
that I see.

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Viral Shah <viral at mayin.org> wrote:
> I do not know what the versions of the dependencies in debian stable are.
>
> cholmod_version was introduced in the last few months, and hence a newer version may be required. Try removing the USE_SYSTEM_SUITESPARSE=1 build option. I am pretty sure also that the lapack version will be too old - at least 3.4 would be good.

lapack is 3.4 in Wheezy, so I continued to use the system version.

>
> -viral
>



More information about the Pkg-julia-devel mailing list