From beaujean at mpp.mpg.de Thu Aug 21 10:21:05 2014 From: beaujean at mpp.mpg.de (Frederik Beaujean) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:21:05 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-julia-devel] Bug#758783: julia: does not start with -p option specified Message-ID: <20140821102105.12098.82714.reportbug@debian-fred> Package: julia Version: 0.2.1+dfsg-3 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I wanted to try the parallel capabilities of julia. Following the manual, I tried to start it up as $ julia -p 2 Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. ^C The same happens even with one process $ julia -p 1 Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. exiting. ^C and I never get to do anything. To start julia at all, I had to use julia -f due to this outstanding bug #755576 bye Fred -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages julia depends on: ii libamd2.3.1 1:4.2.1-3 ii libarpack2 3.1.5-3 ii libblas3 [libblas.so.3] 1.2.20110419-7 ii libc6 2.19-7 ii libcamd2.3.1 1:4.2.1-3 ii libcholmod2.1.2 1:4.2.1-3 ii libcolamd2.8.0 1:4.2.1-3 ii libdouble-conversion1 2.0.1-1 ii libffi6 3.1-2 ii libfftw3-double3 3.3.4-1 ii libfftw3-single3 3.3.4-1 ii libgcc1 1:4.9.1-4 ii libgfortran3 4.9.1-4 ii libgmp10 2:6.0.0+dfsg-4 ii liblapack3 [liblapack.so.3] 3.5.0-3 ii libllvm3.3 1:3.3-16 ii libmpfr4 3.1.2-1 ii libncurses5 5.9+20140712-2 ii libopenblas-base [liblapack.so.3] 0.2.10-2 ii libpcre3 1:8.35-3 ii libquadmath0 4.9.1-4 ii libreadline6 6.3-8 ii libspqr1.3.1 1:4.2.1-3 ii libstdc++6 4.9.1-4 ii libtinfo5 5.9+20140712-2 ii libumfpack5.6.2 1:4.2.1-3 ii libunwind8 1.1-3 ii multiarch-support 2.19-7 Versions of packages julia recommends: ii git 1:2.1.0~rc1-1 Versions of packages julia suggests: pn ess ii julia-doc 0.2.1+dfsg-3 -- no debconf information From SCounts at rcmhd.org Thu Aug 21 13:00:39 2014 From: SCounts at rcmhd.org (Counts, Sandra) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 06:00:39 -0700 Subject: [Pkg-julia-devel] I Have A Transaction For You: Write Me On: Hans-ziner@outlook.com Message-ID: <59F53D5AADFF6A43B3C071A380E5BDCCDFFEE6@sherlock.rcmh.local> Hans-ziner at outlook.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noreply at release.debian.org Thu Aug 21 16:39:17 2014 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:39:17 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-julia-devel] julia REMOVED from testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the julia source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.2.1+dfsg-3 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: # 755576,753971 The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From sebastien at debian.org Thu Aug 21 19:17:14 2014 From: sebastien at debian.org (=?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Villemot) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 21:17:14 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-julia-devel] Bug#753971: julia: Please update the llvm dependency from 3.3 to 3.4 (or better, llvm-dev) In-Reply-To: <53BAB39F.80703@debian.org> References: <20140706173902.4253.39221.reportbug@leyte.mozilla.com> <1404683733.4782.17.camel@rama.villemot.name> <1404684747.4782.19.camel@rama.villemot.name> <53BA418C.5080207@debian.org> <53BA5426.6080606@debian.org> <55F6653F-7AEF-4EE5-A8BD-BD2163633BCB@mayin.org> <53BAB39F.80703@debian.org> Message-ID: <1408648634.20543.2.camel@kalki.villemot.name> Hi Sylvestre, Le lundi 07 juillet 2014 ? 16:50 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru a ?crit : > Me too but 3.3 is already more than an year old. It is unmaintained > (unlike 3.4 which has point releases) and 3.5 will be part of Debian Jessie. > I cannot afford to maintain 4 versions of LLVM in parallel (3.3, 3.4, > 3.5 and snapshot). julia has been removed from jessie, and I raised the severity of the present bug to serious, so you can safely remove LLVM 3.3 from jessie if you wish. I am working on a version of julia that builds against LLVM 3.5. Hopefully it will reach sid soon. Cheers, -- .''`. S?bastien Villemot : :' : Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From sylvestre at debian.org Thu Aug 21 20:21:13 2014 From: sylvestre at debian.org (Sylvestre Ledru) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:21:13 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-julia-devel] Bug#753971: julia: Please update the llvm dependency from 3.3 to 3.4 (or better, llvm-dev) In-Reply-To: <1408648634.20543.2.camel@kalki.villemot.name> References: <20140706173902.4253.39221.reportbug@leyte.mozilla.com> <1404683733.4782.17.camel@rama.villemot.name> <1404684747.4782.19.camel@rama.villemot.name> <53BA418C.5080207@debian.org> <53BA5426.6080606@debian.org> <55F6653F-7AEF-4EE5-A8BD-BD2163633BCB@mayin.org> <53BAB39F.80703@debian.org> <1408648634.20543.2.camel@kalki.villemot.name> Message-ID: <53F654B9.1010005@debian.org> On 21/08/2014 21:17, S?bastien Villemot wrote: > Hi Sylvestre, > > Le lundi 07 juillet 2014 ? 16:50 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru a ?crit : > >> Me too but 3.3 is already more than an year old. It is unmaintained >> (unlike 3.4 which has point releases) and 3.5 will be part of Debian Jessie. >> I cannot afford to maintain 4 versions of LLVM in parallel (3.3, 3.4, >> 3.5 and snapshot). > julia has been removed from jessie, and I raised the severity of the > present bug to serious, so you can safely remove LLVM 3.3 from jessie if > you wish. > > I am working on a version of julia that builds against LLVM 3.5. > Hopefully it will reach sid soon. > > Oh, merci :) Good luck with the 3.5 based packaging. Sylvestre