[Pkg-julia-devel] Julia parallel test

[Viral Shah]

Could you provide this test case in the github issue upstream? I’d like to add it to the tests.

I think in general much work on openlibm is due, and some decisions need to be taken.

-viral



> On 12-Nov-2015, at 10:11 AM, Peter Colberg <peter at colberg.org> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:57:31PM -0500, Peter Colberg wrote:
>> # gcc -shared -o empty.so -xc /dev/null -lopenlibm
>> 
>> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/5/../../../i386-linux-gnu/libopenlibm.so: scalblnf: invalid version 26898 (max
>> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/5/../../../i386-linux-gnu/libopenlibm.so: error adding symbols: Bad value
>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> The culprit is libm.
> 
> When I build openlibm without fix-underlinking.patch, the linking
> works fine. Given that openlibm is a substitute for libm, this is
> not that suprising.
> 
> I wonder though how upstream openlibm can use logl, expl, powl from
> libm without linking to it, as you have described in that patch.
> 
> Until upstream solves the issue [1], could you revert the patch?
> 
> [1] https://github.com/JuliaLang/openlibm/pull/99
> 
> Peter
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-julia-devel mailing list
> Pkg-julia-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-julia-devel