[Pkg-kde-commits] rev 755 - branches/kde-3.4.0/packages/kdebase/debian

[Christopher Martin]

--nextPart1408736.4bhT044EIV
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On March 9, 2005 17:59, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Mer 9 Mars 2005 23:13, chrsmrtn-guest@costa.debian.org a =E9crit :
> > Author: chrsmrtn-guest
> > Date: 2005-03-08 23:43:21 +0100 (Tue, 08 Mar 2005)
> > New Revision: 755
> >
> > Modified:
> >    branches/kde-3.4.0/packages/kdebase/debian/control
> >    branches/kde-3.4.0/packages/kdebase/debian/kdebase-bin.install
> >    branches/kde-3.4.0/packages/kdebase/debian/kdm.install
> > Log:
> > Move kgreet_classic.* to kdm from kdebase-bin.
> >
> > Add replaces, and remove kdm's dependency on kdebase-bin.
> > If anyone knows any reason this is a bad idea, let me know.
>
> IMHO, this is a *really* good idea, since kdm dependencies will be
> lighter !
>
> btw, are we sure nothing uses kgreet_classic.* ?

Sure. Nope :) But I figured we'd find out pretty quickly from people who=20
don't have kdm installed (when kdm goes on alioth), so what the hell...

> (i think not, but ...)=20
> because if yes, things that are not related to a login manager would
> depend on it, and users will be quite angry if they prefer
> gdm/wdm/entrance/... and that we force them to have kdm on their box

We'd have to revert the change, or do something even more clever - having=20
everything depend on kdm is obviously not an option.

Cheers,
Christopher

--nextPart1408736.4bhT044EIV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Signed by Christopher Martin <chrsmrtn@freeshell.org>

iD8DBQBCL4WCU+gWW+vtsysRAiDfAKCwiDOk1w8L0pqDtVjHyXG5B55McQCgkR1o
ezIufYEhQyKYHazZCmVlMVU=
=TIls
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1408736.4bhT044EIV--