[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#339160: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Debian Bug Tracking System owner at bugs.debian.org
Wed Nov 16 14:33:17 UTC 2005


Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:23 +0100
with message-id <17275.16483.180314.591061 at gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:55:35 +0000
>From doko at cs.tu-berlin.de Mon Nov 14 22:55:35 2005
Return-path: <doko at cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Ebuj8-0006mJ-KJ
	for submit at bugs.debian.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:55:35 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (postfix at mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25059
	for <submit at bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:32 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988F7F212
	for <submit at bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:32 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 22096-04 for <submit at bugs.debian.org>;
 Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:32 +0100 (MET) 13909
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	for <submit at bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:32 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko at localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6tWM9008753
	for submit at bugs.debian.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:32 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:32 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko at cs.tu-berlin.de>
Message-Id: <200511150655.jAF6tWM9008753 at bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: submit at bugs.debian.org
Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: digikam
Severity: important

Please do not take any action before reading
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html

This bug report is filed against the source package which builds
a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing
*mt_alloc* symbols.  The package has to be rebuilt with either
g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer).  Please rename the
library package to a name with a "c2a" suffix, and adjust the build
dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist.

Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this
bug report.

If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with
a short reasoning.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339160-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2005 14:25:12 +0000
>From doko at cs.tu-berlin.de Wed Nov 16 06:25:12 2005
Return-path: <doko at cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from bueno.cs.tu-berlin.de
	([130.149.23.253] helo=mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ident=root)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EcODo-0002RC-7F; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:25:12 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (postfix at mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA11676;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FACF20C;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 24128-14; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:23 +0100 (MET) 11250
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:23 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko at localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAGELN69027316;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:23 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko at cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <17275.16483.180314.591061 at gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:21:23 +0100
To: 339160-done at bugs.debian.org, 339184-done at bugs.debian.org,
        339191-done at bugs.debian.org, 339258-done at bugs.debian.org,
        339264-done at bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration
In-Reply-To: <200511150938.23900.chrsmrtn at debian.org>
References: <17272.29068.221381.122747 at gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<200511150938.23900.chrsmrtn at debian.org>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Christopher Martin writes:
> On November 14, 2005 06:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > List of source packages with libraries, which need to be renamed:
> >
> >    Ben Burton <bab at debian.org>
> >        regina-normal
> >    Christopher Martin <chrsmrtn at debian.org>
> >        gwenview
> >    Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> >        digikam
> >    Enrique Robledo Arnuncio <era at debian.org>
> >        rosegarden4
> > =A0 =A0Helen Faulkner <helen at debian.org>
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0labplot
> >    Murat Demirten <murat at debian.org>
> >        sim
>=20
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but these packages depend on kdelibs, and th=
us as=20
> during the gcc-4.0 transition, shouldn't need to have their libs rena=
med.=20
> They have to be rebuilt to find the new kdelibs4c2a anyway.
>=20
> Note that I only glanced at the list provided to spot KDE-based packa=
ges; I=20
> did not perform a thorough survey, so there may be others in this cat=
egory.
>=20
> It might be good to send follow-up notes to the bugs filed against th=
ese=20
> packages clarifying the situation, just so that maintainers don't mak=
e=20
> unnecessary changes.

closing these reports, because the libraries directly depend on kdelibs=
4c2



More information about the pkg-kde-extras mailing list