Hi Ana and all,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Ana Guerrero <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ana@debian.org">ana@debian.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
[For who does not know what I am talking about, it is about the website:<br>
<a href="http://www.debian-desktop.org:80/doku.php/" target="_blank">http://www.debian-desktop.org:80/doku.php/</a><br>
that points to <a href="http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/" target="_blank">http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/</a> ]<br>
<br>
Hi Martin and all,<br>
<br>
I do not have any problem at all with you offering KDE packages. You<br>
are totally free to do so, and I am sure your work is highly appreciated for a<br>
lot of users. But I have problems with the whole debian-desktop official<br>
project thing. AFAIK, Debian desktop subproject is to work on the integration of<br>
the various desktop-related packages, bug reports, questions and patches<br>
*inside* Debian.<br>
You are providing packages named as the "official" ones of the "Official<br>
DebianDesktop project" and those packages should be the packages in the archive<br>
for any desktop.</blockquote><div><br>I had no intention to mark the site as the official website for the DebianDesktop project.<br>Maybe my wording was wrong. I changed the wording to make clear that my site is not the official website.<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
Debian-Desktop is about making better the desktop experience in Debian not<br>
having official packages outside the archive.<br>
<br>
To the list: What is debian-desktop subproject supposed to be currently?<br>
<br>
In any case a small request: could you put clearly in <a href="http://debian-desktop.org" target="_blank">debian-desktop.org</a> that<br>
your KDE packages are unofficial and not necesarily upgrade compatible with<br>
the archive ones?</blockquote><div><br>Of course.<br>The statement is now online.<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<br>
Again, I have not problems with you offering the packages, just with the whole<br>
"official" thing that is confusing...</blockquote><div><br>Again, it was not my intention.<br>Thank you for letting me know about this misspelling.<br></div></div><br>Thanks,<br><br>Martin<br>