[Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#797513: Bug#797513: Regression in support for custom CPU configuration

[Ben Hutchings]

On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 15:53 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 00:38:31 +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:28:10PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > > Interesting, so it seems syscall feature is missing in both cases, which
> > > is why libvirt detects the CPU as n270 or coreduo (all new CPU models
> > > require syscall feature). Would you mind attaching the output of the
> > > "cpuid -1r" command?
> > 
> > Attached.
> 
> Thanks, the attached file confirms the CPU does not support syscall.
> Which means libvirt is correct in this part, I will play more with the
> data to look into the vendor issue.
[...]

Could this be due to running 32-bit userland on a 64-bit kernel?  Intel
CPUs do not support syscall from 32-bit code.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
[W]e found...that it wasn't as easy to get programs right as we had thought.
... I realized that a large part of my life from then on was going to be spent
in finding mistakes in my own programs. - Maurice Wilkes, 1949
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-libvirt-maintainers/attachments/20150918/c64ff8e0/attachment.sig>