[pkg-lighttpd] Bug#498951: Bug#498951: closed by Olaf van der Spek <olaf at xwis.net> ()

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:44:08PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>> I understand, but IMO that may/should involve improving Debconf if 
>>> necessary.
>>
>> Sure. Improvements won't hurt.
>>
>> And while waiting for improvements to debconf to occur, the larger 
>> packaging ecosystem will benefit from adding custom debconf code, I 
>> believe.
>
>It's not rocket science. I don't see why you'd waste time on a work 
>around when you could be spending time on the solution.

Feel free to improve Debocnf.  I won't stop you - on the contrary :-D


>>>> git-buildpackage) which I imagine you wouldn't want to adopt just 
>>>> to get me involved.
>>>
>>> Why would a change be necessary before you can get involved?
>>
>> Instead of debating that, let's try the opposite:
>>
>> Would you be interested in teaming up with me in maintaining lighttpd 
>> for Debian?
>>
>> Due to my personal streamlining (I am involved in 140+ packages), I 
>> require all packages that I am involved in to use CDBS and 
>> git-buildpackage.
>
>Seems a bit silly to require others to use the tools you prefer just 
>because that's easier for you.

Then I am silly.


  - Jonas

-- 
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-lighttpd-maintainers/attachments/20101029/611bffbb/attachment.pgp>