[Pkg-ltsp-devel] sarge-backport branch

[Gustavo Franco]

On 1/30/06, Otavio Salvador <otavio at debian.org> wrote:
> Gustavo Franco <gustavorfranco at gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > I think we should try keep the main branch, sid and sarge compatible.
> > If it can't be possible right now, we should maintain two official
> > branches: one for unstable packages and a second to sarge, both in our
> > alioth repository. Of course vagrant, me, otavio and others should
> > keep their own branches having pkg-ltsp main and pkg-ltsp sarge as
> > ancestors. Comments ?
>
> I think all those need to merge ASAP to main. We might need to start
> to test, stabilize and then release a stable package  for Debian from
> it before start to look for new features. After that, while we're
> improving its stability we'll have  time to move all new features to
> it.
>

I agree Otavio, btw i think we need to do two things:

* Release the first ltsp under pkg-ltsp group based in mdz, vagrant
and pere work tied together in our official branch at alioth;

Status: Pere needs to agree, he said something about release a new
package (with sound support) before the pkg-ltsp thing. Vagrant latest
stuff as published in this thread needs merge and test.


* Write a "pkg-ltsp policy" documentation, to put together the things
we have discussed in the past threads.

Status: I can start a draft and publish it here to review.


--
Gustavo Franco