[Pkg-ltsp-devel] Bug#454478: ltspfsd should not recommends ldm
Mario Izquierdo (mariodebian)
mariodebian at gmail.com
Wed Dec 5 15:09:50 UTC 2007
Package: ltspfsd
Version: 0.5+debian1
Severity: normal
lstpfsd is used only in LTSP chroot and Recomends ldm package.
I'm working on new thin client implementation and try to put into Debian
officially. I don't need ldm login manager, only ltspfsd daemon.
Since some time, apt recommended packages are installed and
without extra configuration can install ltspfsd without ldm.
# LC_ALL=C apt-get install ltspfsd
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
ldm
The following NEW packages will be installed:
ldm ltspfsd
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/193kB of archives.
After unpacking 463kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
# LC_ALL=C apt-get -o "APT::Install-Recommends=false" install ltspfsd
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Recommended packages:
ldm
The following NEW packages will be installed:
ltspfsd
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/16.0kB of archives.
After unpacking 131kB of additional disk space will be used.
(Reading database ... 260825 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking ltspfsd (from .../ltspfsd_0.5+debian1_i386.deb) ...
Setting up ltspfsd (0.5+debian1) ...
Can you move ldm to suggests?
Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages ltspfsd depends on:
ii libc6 2.7-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii lsof 4.78.dfsg.1-3 List open files
ii python 2.4.4-6 An interactive high-level object-o
Versions of packages ltspfsd recommends:
pn ldm <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
More information about the Pkg-ltsp-devel
mailing list