[Pkg-ltsp-devel] Bug#454478: Bug#454478: Bug#454478: Bug#454478: ltspfsd should not recommends ldm

[Otavio Salvador]

mariodebian <mariodebian at gmail.com> writes:

>> i dont see a reason why we shouldnt split the binary into ltspfsd-core
>> and ltspfsd-scripts and an ltspfsd metapackage that depends on both. 
>> 
>> that way you could use the ltspfsd-core package which contains only the
>> binary. it has the advantage that the scripts can be arch: all
>> 
>> any opinions ? 
>> 
>> ciao
>> 	oli
>
> I fully agree.

I agree on it too. It makes more easy for others to use it in advanced
ways even that it looks strange from an outsider POV.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio at debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."