[Pkg-lustre-maintainers] Status of 1.6.2 packaging?

Patrick Winnertz patrick.winnertz at skolelinux.org
Wed Sep 19 17:02:27 UTC 2007


Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2007 17:01:45 schrieb Niklas Edmundsson:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > I would update dpkg or supply the subsitution variable manually.
>
> I changed binary:Version to Source-Version, it worked much better
> although I suspect there is some difference in some case. If there
> isn't a very good reason for using binary:Version I would suggest
> changing it to Source-Version for back-compatibility reasons.
No, sorry
We need binary:Version since without binary:Version this package is not 
binNMU save.

>
> Building the thing then went fine. However, I have a few packaging
> bugs to report:
>
> linux-patch-lustre should depend on dpatch. There are possibly similar
> dependency issues with lustre-source (quilt/dpatch).
Why? We don't use there dpatch at all. Only quilt. This works very fine in 
debian. :)

>
> lustre-source seems to install the modules to the wrong directory, ie.
> if uname -r says 2.6.18-lustre-amd64-k8-smp the modules gets put in
> /lib/modules/2.6.18 which isn't too bright.
I'll look at this. But the last times i bulid a kernel the modules get 
installed in the correct location. 

Greetings
Patrick Winnertz

-- 
 .''`.   Patrick Winnertz <patrick.winnertz at skolelinux.org>
:  :' :  GNU/Linux Debian-Edu Developer
`. `'`   http://www.der-winnie.de http://d.skolelinux.org/~winnie
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems



More information about the Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list