From adelia.mendes at tce.am.gov.br Sat Nov 1 00:36:49 2014 From: adelia.mendes at tce.am.gov.br (Ruth Horwitz) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 20:36:49 -0400 (AMT) Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Congratulations In-Reply-To: <893936475.1548263.1414802183170.JavaMail.root@tce.am.gov.br> Message-ID: <621019642.1548322.1414802209074.JavaMail.root@tce.am.gov.br> Dear E-mail Account User, After a random automated selection of email addresses over the Internet, your email emerged as one of our special winners to receive ?3,252,590.00 and is attached to the following details: FILE CATEGORY - LOTTTO-ENGLAND/01/2014 Ticket No: 13/299 Reference Number: 89,DW,83/LOTTO-LUCKY5 To confirm the authenticity and validity of your winnings as well as to commence receipts of your entitlement, you MUST FORWARD a copy of this announcement as well as your FULL NAMES - VALID MOBILE/CELL NO. - COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE - to our Winnings Director via contact information below: Mr.Michael Thompson, Winnings Director, Automated Winnings Department, Email: michael_wd at foxmail.com Yours faithfully, Ruth Horwitz, Automated Winnings Coordinator, Automated Winnings Department Email: rhorwitz984 at gmail.com From anbe at debian.org Sat Nov 1 14:14:51 2014 From: anbe at debian.org (Andreas Beckmann) Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 15:14:51 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#767616: lyx: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/lyx.png Message-ID: <20141101141451.27062.36322.reportbug@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de> Package: lyx Version: 2.1.2-3 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'testing'. It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a Breaks+Replaces relation. See policy 7.6 at http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): Preparing to unpack .../archives/lyx_2.1.2-3_amd64.deb ... Unpacking lyx (2.1.2-3) over (2.1.2-2) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/lyx_2.1.2-3_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/lyx.png', which is also in package lyx-common 2.1.2-2 dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Preparing to unpack .../lyx-common_2.1.2-3_all.deb ... Unpacking lyx-common (2.1.2-3) over (2.1.2-2) ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/lyx_2.1.2-3_amd64.deb cheers, Andreas -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: lyx_2.1.2-3.log.gz Type: application/gzip Size: 12816 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nick.andrik at gmail.com Mon Nov 3 15:19:30 2014 From: nick.andrik at gmail.com (Nikos Andrikos) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:19:30 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#767616: Bug#767616: lyx: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/lyx.png In-Reply-To: <20141101141451.27062.36322.reportbug@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de> References: <20141101141451.27062.36322.reportbug@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de> Message-ID: Hi Andreas, In lyx control file, there is this line: Depends: ... lyx-common (= ${source:Version}), ... I thought this is enough to make sure that along lyx 2.1.2-3, the only installable lyx-common version will be 2.1.2-3 . If this is not the case, then we would need to add the breaks/replaces options as you suggested, but could you please confirm that this is the proper action? Thanks for reporting the issue, Nikos 2014-11-01 15:14 GMT+01:00 Andreas Beckmann : > Package: lyx > Version: 2.1.2-3 > Severity: serious > User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from > 'testing'. > It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails > because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a > Breaks+Replaces relation. > > See policy 7.6 at > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces > > >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > > Preparing to unpack .../archives/lyx_2.1.2-3_amd64.deb ... > Unpacking lyx (2.1.2-3) over (2.1.2-2) ... > dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/lyx_2.1.2-3_amd64.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/lyx.png', which is also in package lyx-common 2.1.2-2 > dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) > Preparing to unpack .../lyx-common_2.1.2-3_all.deb ... > Unpacking lyx-common (2.1.2-3) over (2.1.2-2) ... > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/lyx_2.1.2-3_amd64.deb > > > cheers, > > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-lyx-devel mailing list > Pkg-lyx-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lyx-devel From pelle at dsv.su.se Tue Nov 4 08:44:07 2014 From: pelle at dsv.su.se (Per Olofsson) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 09:44:07 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#767616: Bug#767616: Bug#767616: lyx: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/lyx.png In-Reply-To: References: <20141101141451.27062.36322.reportbug@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de> Message-ID: <545891D7.9050100@dsv.su.se> Hi Nikos, 2014-11-03 16:19, Nikos Andrikos skrev: > In lyx control file, there is this line: > Depends: ... lyx-common (= ${source:Version}), ... > > I thought this is enough to make sure that along lyx 2.1.2-3, the only > installable lyx-common version will be 2.1.2-3 . No, it is not enough. Depends only ensures that the packages are configured in the right order, but there can still be different versions unpacked on the system at the same time. (One can use Pre-Depends to force packages to be unpacked in some order, but that is discouraged and needs approval.) > If this is not the case, then we would need to add the breaks/replaces > options as you suggested, but could you please confirm that this is > the proper action? Yes. You need something like Package: lyx ... Replaces: lyx-common (<< 2.1.2-3) Breaks: lyx-common (<< 2.1.2-3) -- Pelle From sven at timegate.de Sun Nov 9 16:12:56 2014 From: sven at timegate.de (Sven Hoexter) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 17:12:56 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] removal of dvipost In-Reply-To: <20141027185608.GB4311@timegate.de> References: <20141027185608.GB4311@timegate.de> Message-ID: <20141109161256.GA15698@timegate.de> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 07:56:08PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > Hi, > did someone maybe try out the new overstrike stuff that does not > rely on dvipost? I just adopted that from the Fedora guys a few > weeks ago and would like to fill a request for removal before > jessie to get rid of dvipost. I've done that now and filled a RM bug. Sven From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Mon Nov 10 12:46:57 2014 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:46:57 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#768845: Removed package(s) from unstable Message-ID: We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: dvipost | 1.1-4 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc dvipost | 1.1-4+b1 | hurd-i386 ------------------- Reason ------------------- ROM; dead upstream; dvipost no longer needed by LyX ---------------------------------------------- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 768845 at bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/768845 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Mon Nov 10 12:47:03 2014 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian FTP Masters) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:47:03 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#768845: Removed package(s) from unstable Message-ID: Version: 1.1-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package dvipost has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/768845 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) From owner at bugs.debian.org Mon Nov 10 12:51:09 2014 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:51:09 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#715846: marked as done ([Mayhem] Bug report on dvipost: dvipost crashes with exit status 139) References: <201307101856.r6AIute3015018@smtp.andrew.cmu.edu> Message-ID: Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:47:03 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#768845: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #715846, regarding [Mayhem] Bug report on dvipost: dvipost crashes with exit status 139 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 715846: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=715846 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Alexandre Rebert Subject: [Mayhem] Bug report on dvipost: dvipost crashes with exit status 139 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:56:55 -0400 Size: 30480 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Debian FTP Masters Subject: Bug#768845: Removed package(s) from unstable Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:47:03 +0000 Size: 2816 URL: From noreply at release.debian.org Tue Nov 11 16:39:18 2014 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:39:18 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] dvipost REMOVED from testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the dvipost source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.1-4 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From lasgouttes at lyx.org Tue Nov 18 14:09:08 2014 From: lasgouttes at lyx.org (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:09:08 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] LyX 2.0.8 in stable? Message-ID: <546B5304.3030601@lyx.org> Dear Debian Maintainers, We had a bug report on LyX lists from a wheezy user who is currently running LyX 2.0.3. While I understand why stable does not use 2.1.2, I am wondering whether debian policies would allow to upgrade stable to the latest LyX stable branch. Is this not permitted, or is it rather that you prefer to concentrate your work on the testing branch? Best regards, Jean-Marc From pelle at dsv.su.se Tue Nov 18 15:30:57 2014 From: pelle at dsv.su.se (Per Olofsson) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:30:57 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] LyX 2.0.8 in stable? In-Reply-To: <546B5304.3030601@lyx.org> References: <546B5304.3030601@lyx.org> Message-ID: <546B6631.4020700@dsv.su.se> Hi, Den 2014-11-18 15:09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes skrev: > We had a bug report on LyX lists from a wheezy user who is currently > running LyX 2.0.3. While I understand why stable does not use 2.1.2, I > am wondering whether debian policies would allow to upgrade stable to > the latest LyX stable branch. > > Is this not permitted, or is it rather that you prefer to concentrate > your work on the testing branch? In general it is not permitted, no. Some packages have exceptions (e.g. Firefox/Iceweasel) because it's impossible to provide security updates otherwise. There is also a backports repository where you can upload newer versions of packages built for the stable release. -- Pelle From lasgouttes at lyx.org Tue Nov 18 16:01:13 2014 From: lasgouttes at lyx.org (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:01:13 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] LyX 2.0.8 in stable? In-Reply-To: <546B6631.4020700@dsv.su.se> References: <546B5304.3030601@lyx.org> <546B6631.4020700@dsv.su.se> Message-ID: <546B6D49.7030908@lyx.org> Le 18/11/2014 16:30, Per Olofsson a ?crit : > Den 2014-11-18 15:09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes skrev: >> We had a bug report on LyX lists from a wheezy user who is currently >> running LyX 2.0.3. While I understand why stable does not use 2.1.2, I >> am wondering whether debian policies would allow to upgrade stable to >> the latest LyX stable branch. >> >> Is this not permitted, or is it rather that you prefer to concentrate >> your work on the testing branch? > > In general it is not permitted, no. > > Some packages have exceptions (e.g. Firefox/Iceweasel) because it's > impossible to provide security updates otherwise. There is also a > backports repository where you can upload newer versions of packages > built for the stable release. Thanks for the answer, this is what I thought the answer would be :( In the case of LyX, this is not good news, since we try hard to have a stable branch which is actually stable. And would you consider proposing LyX 2.0.8 or even 2.1.2 in the backports directory for stable? Thanks for your quick answer. JMarc From pelle at dsv.su.se Tue Nov 18 17:00:44 2014 From: pelle at dsv.su.se (Per Olofsson) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:00:44 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] LyX 2.0.8 in stable? In-Reply-To: <546B6D49.7030908@lyx.org> References: <546B5304.3030601@lyx.org> <546B6631.4020700@dsv.su.se> <546B6D49.7030908@lyx.org> Message-ID: <546B7B3C.5090907@dsv.su.se> Den 2014-11-18 17:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes skrev: > Thanks for the answer, this is what I thought the answer would be :( In > the case of LyX, this is not good news, since we try hard to have a > stable branch which is actually stable. > > And would you consider proposing LyX 2.0.8 or even 2.1.2 in the > backports directory for stable? I'm not really much involved with LyX packaging anymore, but maybe someone will. There's also a new stable Debian release coming out soon-ish. -- Pelle From pelle at dsv.su.se Tue Nov 18 17:01:30 2014 From: pelle at dsv.su.se (Per Olofsson) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:01:30 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] LyX 2.0.8 in stable? In-Reply-To: <546B7B3C.5090907@dsv.su.se> References: <546B5304.3030601@lyx.org> <546B6631.4020700@dsv.su.se> <546B6D49.7030908@lyx.org> <546B7B3C.5090907@dsv.su.se> Message-ID: <546B7B6A.7020900@dsv.su.se> Den 2014-11-18 18:00, Per Olofsson skrev: > There's also a new stable Debian release coming out soon-ish. ...which will have 2.1.2. -- Pelle From lasgouttes at lyx.org Tue Nov 18 19:09:10 2014 From: lasgouttes at lyx.org (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:09:10 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] LyX 2.0.8 in stable? In-Reply-To: <546B7B6A.7020900@dsv.su.se> References: <546B5304.3030601@lyx.org> <546B6631.4020700@dsv.su.se> <546B6D49.7030908@lyx.org> <546B7B3C.5090907@dsv.su.se> <546B7B6A.7020900@dsv.su.se> Message-ID: <546B9956.4020003@lyx.org> Le 18/11/2014 18:01, Per Olofsson a ?crit : > Den 2014-11-18 18:00, Per Olofsson skrev: >> There's also a new stable Debian release coming out soon-ish. > > ...which will have 2.1.2. Yes, I have seen that. THanks. JMarc From informationen at sparkasse.de Wed Nov 19 14:36:43 2014 From: informationen at sparkasse.de (Sparkasse) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:36:43 +1100 (AEDT) Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Aktualisieren Sie Ihr Konto Sicherheits-informationen Message-ID: <20141119143643.95C70E19D63@ds01144.snspreview.com.au> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dekelrachel at outlook.com Wed Nov 19 13:00:10 2014 From: dekelrachel at outlook.com (Rachel Dekel) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:00:10 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] I am waiting to hear from you Message-ID: Hello,I'm glad to get back to you and also to know what the problem is that i have not received a response from you after my previous mail to this address,please respond to me because there are very important topics that I want to discuss with you.i will be waiting to read from your reply soon, Regards,Rachel. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wilson_willa at yahoo.in Wed Nov 19 22:03:53 2014 From: wilson_willa at yahoo.in (Mr Wilson Willa) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 04:03:53 +0600 (BDT) Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] THE FIRST $5000.00 WAS SENT TODAY Message-ID: <4819.196.46.245.135.1416434633.squirrel@mail.promotex-bd.com> Attn: Good day Your fund of $2.500, 000.00 has been released and the transfer began today through western union money transfer. So, contact Western Union Director Dr Kevin Anthony, with your full information to enable them give you Sender Name, Question and Answer to pick up your First Payment MTCN= 8845-115-202 and ask him what you need to do to enable them activate your account and renew of your file so that you will be able to pick up your first payment $5000 per day until total funds 2.5millions is finish. Your Receiver name-------------- You?re Country-------------------- You?re City----------------------- Your Tell----------------------- You?re Id------------------------- you're Age----------------------- Forward the information here ( union.western at barid.com ) Or Call Dr Kevin Anthony On tel phone: +229-67377275 Thanks Mr Wilson Willa From bankofficemail77 at yahoo.pt Thu Nov 20 23:26:06 2014 From: bankofficemail77 at yahoo.pt (Sarmi Nasri) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 23:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] =?utf-8?q?PR=C3=8DSNE_MEZI_MNOU_A_TEBOU?= Message-ID: <1582115921.1859684.1416525966693.JavaMail.yahoo@jws11149.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> ?Zdrav?m! Po hodne uva?ov?n? na toto t?ma, rozhodl jsem se v?s kontaktovat, jmenuji se Sarmi Nasri, ??d?m o v?? souhlas k v?m jako dal?? pr?buzn? na zemrel?ho z?kazn?ka na?? banky, kter? zemrel lety bez stanoven?ch dedicu tak, ?e banka nebude zabavit jeho vklad (EU ? 2.9M) a vr?tit jej vl?de Benin. Tak? si v?imnete, ?e zemrel? vklad m? otevrenou pr?jemce a ka?d? cizinec mu?e d?t n?rok pres fondu bez ohledu na Va?e kmene, jm?na a n?bo?enstv? za predpokladu, ?e m?te tajn? informace o zabezpecen? souboru pl??te zesnul?ho n?nosu, kter? jsem se vybavit, aby v?s na po??d?n? org?ny m? banky. ? J? jsem jen kontaktovat v?s jako cizinec, proto?e tyto prostredky nemohou b?t schv?len do m?stn? banky zde ale mu?e b?t schv?len pouze na zahranicn? bankovn? ?cet, proto?e pen?ze jsou na ?ctu EU euro a b?val? majitel ?ctu Late pan Fernando R. Olmos, je z va?eho regionu pr?li?. M?m c?lem je, aby zdroj na poctiv? a duveryhodn? osoba, kter? mohu sverit tyto financn? prostredky a kdo bude pusobit jako spr?vce do doby, ne? muj pr?jezd ve va?? zemi, proto?e m? doby uvolnen? ze slu?by je bl?zko. ? V?ce informac? bude v?m d?no, jakmile odpoved na muj soukrom? e-mail ? pozdravy Sarmi Nasri -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zhuyun at njnu.edu.cn Sat Nov 22 22:49:40 2014 From: zhuyun at njnu.edu.cn (=?utf-8?B?6buE5Zu95ruh?=) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:49:40 +0800 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] (no subject) Message-ID: <20141123064947610632@njnu.edu.cn> ?? ??? ===?s??=?=== TEL? 13723404057 ?????Q?147655586 ??? violence n.???????? ===????== ==????== ==??????== ??????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zhuyun at njnu.edu.cn Sat Nov 22 22:49:40 2014 From: zhuyun at njnu.edu.cn (=?utf-8?B?6buE5Zu95ruh?=) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:49:40 +0800 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] (no subject) Message-ID: <20141123064947610632@njnu.edu.cn> ?? ??? ===?s??=?=== TEL? 13723404057 ?????Q?147655586 ??? violence n.???????? ===????== ==????== ==??????== ??????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From selecao.recrutamento at literatus.edu.br Sat Nov 22 09:51:57 2014 From: selecao.recrutamento at literatus.edu.br (KRAUSE Arno) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 04:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Darlehen angebot Message-ID: -- Hallo, Haben Sie Interesse an einer finanziellen Darlehen zu 3%? kontaktieren Sie mich f?r Details und Bedingungen. meine mail: krause.arno at att.net danke From joy_basim at yahoo.com Tue Nov 25 02:49:38 2014 From: joy_basim at yahoo.com (Faith Attah) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] FROM Ms Faith Titi Attah Message-ID: <1301871416.548357.1416883778853.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10618.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Dearest one I wish you and your family happy moments of life now and forever more amen.Please, I do not have formal relationship with you but because of my present predicament and circumstances I am made to contact you.I have been suffering from cancer of the Lungs and has a short life to leave.I have made up my mind to donate my inheritance of 21.5 million US to the less privileged please help me to fulfill my last wish.please CONTACT ME TO MY EMAIL faithattah27 at cantv.net Thanks Ms Faith Titi Attah -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From eliza47eliz at hotmail.com Wed Nov 26 13:29:42 2014 From: eliza47eliz at hotmail.com (eliza babe) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] hi Message-ID: <1043069447.1901516.1417008582785.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10602g.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Hello My Dear. how are you, hope fine. My name is Eliza, am very glad to come across your email profile today, which i find interesting and wish to let you know that i will like to have a very good relationship with you, i hope you will welcome my friendship request? Please respond to my mail directly so that l will give you my pictures and tell you more about myself. Miss Eliza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ciechanow at ctw-energy.com Sat Nov 29 09:17:16 2014 From: ciechanow at ctw-energy.com (Faris Deeb) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 03:17:16 -0600 Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Guaranteed 3% Message-ID: <66081805552218@server> Good Day I am the Head of Finance at Sullah Finance FZE here in Abu Dhabi, UAE. I am looking at investing over US$M900, 000,000.00 that has been placed for investments by a private owner. If you are in need of funds to expand existing businesses or to start up a new project, then look no further as we would be more than delighted to work with you. We are driven by a project's credibility to yield investment returns and should we ascertain your project as such, we will engage our funds at guaranteed 3% Fixed Interest Rate per annum but strictly in form of Loans. Regards, Faris Deeb Sullah Finance Fze Abu Dhabi-UAE. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: