[Pkg-mol-devel] TODO

Gaudenz Steinlin gaudenz at debian.org
Mon Aug 21 21:01:04 UTC 2006


On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:27:44PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 12:54:48PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > - where should drivers go contrib or non-free? Currently
> >   mol-drivers-macos is in contrib and mol-drivers-maxosx is in non-free.
> >   (and if someone has time check if relly all non-main parts are remove
> >   from the mol tarball)
> 
> The question that popped in my mind is what is exactly considered
> non-free in mol-drivers-maxosx? I know for sure mol-drivers-macos is
> in contrib, because to work, it relies on an external ROM image for
> the OldWorld PowerMac that you have to own.

AFAIK you need a proprietary compiler to build the drivers, but the code
itself is free. I'm not sure if this means contrib or non-free. For sure
it can not go into main, because packages in main have to be built using
only things in main. 

> 
> > - Should we put dfsg into the upstream version number like others do? Or
> >   call the source package mol-dfsg?
> 
> I think so, because we are ripping upstream non-free parts.

I prefer to rename the source package (not the binaries). Do you have
any preference?

> > - add tarballs of non-main parts to SVN
> 
> Maybe rather FTP?

I would rather put all things in the same location. What's the advantage
of having them on FTP?

gaudenz

-- 
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
~ Samuel Beckett ~



More information about the Pkg-mol-devel mailing list